Michael Huftile v. L C Miccio-Fonseca
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we must decide a question of first impression: Does the favorable termination rule of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), apply to civil commitments under California’s Sexually Violent Predators Act? We conclude that the Heck rule applies. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Huftile’s § 1983 action for damages and declaratory relief. However, we reverse the dismissal of his claim for prospective injunctive relief under Heck, and remand for further proceedings concerning this form of relief.
I.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Teahan v. WilhelmDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Emily Johnson PiperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Marvin Roberts v. City of FairbanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Lieberman v. Liberty Healthcare Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Ralph Smith, Jr. v. James Hood, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.