Legal Opinion

Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Emily Johnson Piper

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 3, 2017No. 15-3485PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

Class plaintiffs, civilly committed sex offenders, bring a facial and as applied challenge under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming their substantive due process rights have been violated by Minnesota’s Civil Commitment and Treatment Act and by the actions and practices of the managers of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP). The Minnesota state defendants in this action are managers of MSOP— Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services; Kevin Moser, MSOP Facilities Director at Moose Lake; Peter Puffer, MSOP Clinical Director; Nancy…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Kevin Scott Karsjens v. Tony LoureyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Care & Treatment of Kirk v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. Karsjens v. PiperDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
  4. Clay Thomas v. Scott EschenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  5. Kevin Karsjens v. Jodi HarpsteadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API