Legal Opinion

Teahan v. Wilhelm

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 28, 2007No. 06 CV 0015 JMPCLPublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) ADOPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS IN ITS ENTIRETY

MILLER, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the issuance of a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) by the Honorable Peter C. Lewis, United States Magistrate Judge. The R & R recommends that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. The parties have filed timely objections. After conducting a de novo review of those portions to which the parties object, the court hereby sustains Defendants’ objections in their entirety…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Norsworthy v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Samtani v. City of LaredoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  3. Rabinovitz v. City of L. A.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  4. (PC) Baker v. ShahbazianDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. (PC) Bennett v. BurtonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API