Legal Opinion

McLead v. Applegate

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891No. 14,501PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court:

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint alleges that Goldie Rooker and Susie Rooker are the children and only heirs of John and Malinda Rooker, deceased; that the decedents, as tenants by the entireties, owned the undivided one-half of the real estate in controversy, and that William W.' Rooker owned the other one undivided half; that John Rooker died before, his wife Malinda ; that she subsequently married the appellant, McLead, and died in November, 1886; that in November, 1882, William W. Rooker instituted suit for partition against Malinda and her second husband, William J. McLead ; that it was therein decreed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Nealis v. DicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Weiss v. GuerineauIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Jones v. Kokomo Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Mannix v. State ex rel. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoosier Stone Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Levi v. HareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API