McLead v. Applegate
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court:
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint alleges that Goldie Rooker and Susie Rooker are the children and only heirs of John and Malinda Rooker, deceased; that the decedents, as tenants by the entireties, owned the undivided one-half of the real estate in controversy, and that William W.' Rooker owned the other one undivided half; that John Rooker died before, his wife Malinda ; that she subsequently married the appellant, McLead, and died in November, 1886; that in November, 1882, William W. Rooker instituted suit for partition against Malinda and her second husband, William J. McLead ; that it was therein decreed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Nealis v. DicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Weiss v. GuerineauIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Jones v. Kokomo Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Mannix v. State ex rel. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoosier Stone Co. v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Levi v. HareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894