Legal Opinion

Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1986No. 1-685A148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEAL, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-defendants, the Rasps, et al. (Rasps), appeal a Dearborn County Court order denying their Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 12(B)(1) and (6) motions and entering judgment in favor of appellee-plaintiff, Hidden Valley Lake, Inc. (Hidden Valley).

We reverse.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

On August 20, 1982, Hidden Valley filed statements of claim against appellants in separate suits in the Dearborn County Court seeking judgments for water and sewer availability fees, late charges, collection costs, and/or property taxes.1 The claims were made as follows:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skendzel v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Lake County Department of Public Welfare v. Lake Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Colonial Discount Corp. v. BowmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Levi v. HareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cigna-INA/Aetna v. Hagerman-ShambaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Couch v. Hamilton County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Indiana Carpenters Central & Western Indiana Pension Fund v. Seaboard Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Parker v. Schilli TransportationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Parker v. Schilli TransportationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API