Coalition for Affordable Utility Services & Energy Efficiency v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge P. KEVIN BROBSON.
Petitioners, all of whom advocate on behalf of consumers affected by the Customer Assistance Program (CAP) of PECO Energy Company (PECO),1 appeal two orders entered by Respondent the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC). In those two orders, the PUC approved in part a PECO plan, called the CAP Shopping Plan, which would allow PECO’s CAP customers to shop for and choose their electric generation supplier (EGS). The PUC approved the PECO plan only in part, because it Rejected a condition proposed by PECO that would require EGSs that wish to enroll PECO…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Program Administration Services, Inc. v. Dauphin County General AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Mercury Trucking, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Retail Energy Supply Ass'n v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- HIKO Energy, LLC v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Blue Pilot Energy, LLC v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. of PA, by A.G. J. Shapiro v. Progress Auto Salvage, Inc. & E.K. OguejioforCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- HIKO Energy, LLC v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.