Legal Opinion

Pavlovich v. Pavlovich

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1913No. Civ. No. 1096PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of securing a decree that the plaintiffs are the owners each of an undivided one-third of lots 1 and 2 of block 4 in the town of Johnsville, Plumas County, and that the defendant holds said property in trust for them.

Judgment passed for the plaintiffs, decreeing that the plaintiffs are each entitled to a one-third interest in the property described in the complaint, and the clerk of the court is thereby appointed to execute such conveyance in case the defendant fails or refuses to do so.

This appeal is by the defendant from the judgment so rendered and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In Re Estate of WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Alaniz v. CasenaveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hayne v. HermannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. McQuin v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Juranek v. JuranekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Elliott v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Byers v. DohenyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API