Byers v. Doheny
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
The complaint alleges that at all times between July, 1925, and November, 1926, the Crown Oil Company was the owner, subject to a deed of trust, of all the land described in the complaint; that, subject to the same deed of trust, the plaintiff was the owner of an "oil lease upon 40 acres of said property" and an option "for an oil lease upon all of said real property" other than said 40 acres; that prior to any negotiations with the defendant the plaintiff was given judgment against the Crown Oil Company requiring it to execute a lease in accordance with the terms of said option, the judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Breitenbucher v. OppenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Pavlovich v. PavlovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Clark v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Dutton v. Interstate Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Ward v. WrixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.