Legal Opinion

McAllister v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1894No. 1180PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— This case is like Buckley v. Tacoma (No. 1233), and Wingate v. Tacoma (No. 1234), ante p. 253, in some of the principal features, enough, perhaps to decide it. There was a petition to improve Tacoma avenue between North 4th and North 5th streets, by paving the roadway 54 feet wide, with bituminous rock upon a six-inch concrete foundation. The resolution of intention contained this specification: “Said improvement to consist of paving the roadway 54 feet wide with bituminous rock upon a six-inch concrete foundation.” The notice contained a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. JenksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Partridge v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fehler v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  2. People Ex Rel. North v. . FeatherstonhaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Sharum v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Shake v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API