Legal Opinion

Hasha v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1993No. 92-578PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

This is a illegal exaction suit. The taxpayers allege that a primary purpose of the tax has failed and that an injunction should be issued against its continued collection. The chancellor denied relief. We hold that the tax constitutes an illegal exaction and reverse and remand with instructions.

The constitutional provisions and statutes that are applicable to this case are as follows. Article 12, section 3 of the Constitution of Arkansas, in the material part, provides: “The General Assembly shall provide, by general laws, for the organization of cities . . . and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moose v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Hartwick v. ThorneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. City of Jacksonville v. VenhausSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. McClendon v. McKeownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. Vance v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. LeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Oldner v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Boothe v. BootheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API