Legal Opinion

Hartwick v. Thorne

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1990No. 89-109PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

This is an appeal of a chancellor’s ruling requiring the appellants to refund to the appellee taxpayers the principal and interest on a part of a bond issue proceeds which could no longer be spent for a designated project. The appellants argue that the court erred in finding the bond issue to be an illegal exaction and in requiring the accumulated interest on funds set aside from the bond issue to be refunded to the taxpayers. The trial court ruled correctly on each issue, and we therefore affirm.

On July 9,1975, the North Little Rock City Council enacted Ordinance No.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacKey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Samples v. GradySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Pomona City School District v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Miles v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Bell v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Ghegan & Ghegan, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Chapman v. BevilacquaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Hasha v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Oldner v. VillinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API