Legal Opinion

City of Jacksonville v. Venhaus

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 30, 1990No. 89-154PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David M. Glover, Special Justice.

This is the third appeal arising in this illegal exaction action commenced eight years ago. The primary question before us is the proper disposition of undistributed funds collected by taxing authorities and placed in a common fund in accordance with our earlier decisions. The first two appeals were Ragan v. Venhaus, 289 Ark. 266, 711 S.W.2d 467 (1986) and City of Little Rock v. Ragan, 297 Ark. 525, 763 S.W.2d 87 (1989).

In the first appeal we found that the collection of the designated use tax constituted an illegal exaction. Upon remand, the chancellor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Bolden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Halbert v. Helena-West Helena Industrial Development Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Bell v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Ragan v. VenhausSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  2. Acme Brick Co. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Hasha v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Black v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API