Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 2003No. C4-02-396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) paid for property damage to the vehicle of its insured, Michelle Miller, resulting from a collision with a vehicle driven by Glen Meyer, the insured of Respondent Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati). State Farm served on Cincinnati a Petition for Arbitration through Arbitration Forum, Inc., pursuant to an intercompany Automobile Subrogation Arbitration Agreement to which both State Farm and Cincinnati are signatories. When Cincinnati refused to arbitrate, contending that it provided no coverage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Ortega-Maldonado v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API