Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 2003No. C4-02-396Published
1Opinion of the Court
666 N.W.2d 334 (2003)
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. C4-02-396.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
July 31, 2003.
Suzanne Wolbeck Kvas, Stringer & Rohleder, Ltd., St. Paul, MN, for State Farm.
Rolf E. Sonnesyn, Chandelle L. Heyer, Tomsche, Sonnesyn & Tomsche, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Cincinnati Ins. Co.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
Appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) paid for property damage to the vehicle of its insured, Michelle Miller, resulting…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003