Legal Opinion

National Federation of Federal Employees-Iam v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 6, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1735Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES-IAM, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 10-1735 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this case, a union representing federal employees challenges the constitutionality under the Fourth Amendment of a U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) policy expanding random drug testing to incumbent employees who work with at-risk youth in residential Job Corps Civilian Conservation Centers (“JCCCC”).…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API