Legal Opinion

Carr v. Mundorf

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1933No. Appeal, 26PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for damages resulting from his being struck by defendant’s automobile. Defendant appeals. We will consider but a single assignment of'error.

Some eighteen years before the present accident, plaintiff was struck by a.railroad train and his head was very seriously injured. One of the questions involved in the present case was whether or not his existing condition was the result of the earlier accident, rather than of the one under consideration. On this point, defendant called an expert medical witness who had previously…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Twinn v. NobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Linn v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. Monier v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Hoagland v. MulfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Gerz v. WeberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClaiborneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Cain v. KohlmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Duffy v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Mazon v. MazonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Welsbach Street Lighting Co. of America v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API