Duffy v. Griffith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
The atmosphere which pervaded the trial of this case was so prejudicial to the right of plaintiff to a fair and impartial trial as to require the granting of a new trial. The attitude of the trial judge calls for a new trial. See Commonwealth v. Myma, 278 Pa. 505, 123 A. 486; Sarshik v. Fink, 292 Pa. 256, 262, 141 A. 39.
Catherine B. Duffy, by her next friend and mother Catherine Duffy, and Catherine Duffy brought an action in trespass against Frank Griffith. J. H. Rosenberger was brought in as an additional defendant. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Catherine B.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Commonwealth v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Sarshik v. FinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- MacKin v. Patterson, AppellantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Grutski v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Mohn v. Hahnemann Medical College & HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Smith v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Laniecki v. Polish Army Veterans Ass'n of Lucyan ChwalkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.