Legal Opinion

Crisp v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1982No. CA 81-232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

Appellant seeks to reverse the lower court’s judgment for three reasons: (1) the court erroneously admitted into evidence the depositions of appellee and her husband, both of whom appeared and testified at trial; (2) the court should have directed a verdict on behalf of appellants at the close of appellee’s proof and at the conclusion of the trial; and (3) the court’s decision was clearly against the preponderance of the evidence.

Appellee brought this action against appellants for misrepresentations made in their sale of certain real property to appellee. In sum, appellee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane v. RachelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Fausett & Co. v. BullardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Wallin v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Follett v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  2. DC XPRESS, LLC v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Rogers v. University Services & Searcy Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Cliff Peck Chevrolet, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API