Legal Opinion

Fausett & Co. v. Bullard

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 24, 1950No. 4-9153PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

The appellees, W. T. and Aliene Bullard, brought this suit to recover damages resulting from misrepresentation made by the appellant’s agents in connection with the sale of a dwelling house in Little Rock. This appeal is from a judgment entered upon a verdict for $4,463.

The appellant is a corporation engaged in buying and selling real estate. In April of 1948 it owned the house in question and advertised it for sale. For several months the house had been occupied by E. L. Fausett, president of the company. The appellees saw the advertisement and began negotiations that led to their purchasing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. LeMaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Hunt v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Myers v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Whaley v. NivenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Lane v. RachelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Miskimins v. City National Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Herrick v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Clay v. BrandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API