Legal Opinion

Armstrong Bros. Tool Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 25, 1979No. C.R.D. 79-2; Court 77-8-02004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge:

This is an American manufacturers’ action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1582(b) (1970), 28 U.S.C. § 2632(a) (Supp. V 1975) and 19 U.S.C. § 1516(c) (Supp. V 1975), involving the Antidumping Act of 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. §§ 160, et seq. (1970 & Supp. V 1975)). For the background of this litigation, reference is made to my prior opinion in Armstrong Bros. Tool Co. et al. v. United States, etc., 80 Cust.Ct. 160, C.D. 4751, 453 F.Supp. 889, modified on rehearing, 81 Cust.Ct. -, C.R.D. 78-14 (1978).

Plaintiffs, initially by means of a request for production of documents under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  5. V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. First Judicial District CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  3. SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  4. SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. First Judicial District CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API