Legal Opinion
In Re Brimonidine Patent Litigation
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 23, 2009No. MDL Docket 07-md-1866 GMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this consolidated patent infringement action, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants’ proposed generic pharmaceutical products infringe the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit. 1 (D.I. 1.) The court held an eight-day bench trial in this matter on March 9 through March 18, 2009. (D.I. 227-34.) Presently before the court are the parties’ post-trial proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and post-trial motions for judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 52(c) (the “Rule 52(c) motions”).
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), and after…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- In Re Brimonidine Patent LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Icu Medical, Inc. v. Rymed Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re Cyclobenzaprine HydrochlorideDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.