Legal Opinion
Worth v. Jackson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 19, 2005No. CIV.A. 02-1576(RBW)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are (1) the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment (“Defs.’ Mot.”) and their Memorandum in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and for Summary Judgment (“Defs.’ Mem.”); (2) the plaintiffs Statement of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (“PL’s Opp’n”); and (3) the defendants’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment (“Defs.’ Reply”). 1 For the reasons set forth below, this Court grants the defendants’…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- King, William v. Jackson, AlphonsoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Michigan Gambling Opposition (MichGO) v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- King v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Casselle v. FoxxDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016