Legal Opinion
King, William v. Jackson, Alphonso
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 29, 2007No. 06-5149PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant alleges that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by forcing him to resign for having opposed the Department’s refusal to renew its 2003 Affirmative Employment Plan. The district court granted HUD’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on the grounds that Title VII only protects an employee’s opposition to an “unlawful employment practice.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). Because we agree with the district court that Title VII’s definition of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- George, Diane v. Leavitt, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Karl Parker, Jr. v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company T/a the Chessie System the B & O RailroadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Singletary v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Stewart v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Moyo v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Robinson-Reeder v. Am. Council on Educ.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Terveer v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Carter v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Cooper v. New York State Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. & Nat'l SEC. Archive v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.