Legal Opinion

Reinhart v. Rauscher Pierce Securities Corp.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1971No. 671PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Defendants were granted summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal.

We reverse.

Plaintiffs sued defendants for damages for, breach of an oral contract relating to a “stopped stock” loss on three unlisted stocks, or, in the alternative,. damages for defendants’ negligence in failing to sell the stock or advise plaintiffs when the shares dropped below the agreed amount.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on various grounds. Based upon pleadings, depositions and affidavits, the trial court granted defendants summary judgment and dismissed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Iriart v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Mattieligh v. PoeWashington Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Brown v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hardin v. FarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API