Legal Opinion

Mattieligh v. Poe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1960No. 35013PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Plaintiff below appeals from a judgment of dismissal. Appellant sued to recover a real-estate broker’s commission paid to respondent Poe. At the conclusion of appellant’s evidence, the court orally granted respondent’s motion to dismiss “on the ground that the evidence produced by the plaintiff was not sufficient to sustain his cause of action,” and the judgment recites that plaintiff’s case was dismissed because of the insufficiency of his evidence.

So circumstanced, the appellant’s evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to him; that is to say, his evidence must be accepted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. O'BRIEN v. SchultzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Smith v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Latson v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. In Re Youngkin's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hardt v. BrinkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1961
  4. N. Fiorito Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Burien Motors, Inc. v. BalchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API