Legal Opinion

BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 10, 1936No. 597Published

1Opinion of the Court

297 U.S. 251

56 S.Ct. 453

80 L.Ed. 669

BORDEN'S FARM PRODUCTS CO., Inc.,

v.

TEN EYCK, Com'r of Department of Agriculture and Markets of New York, et al.

No. 597.

Argued Jan. 6, 1936.

Decided Feb. 10, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Mr. Walter E. Hope, of New York City, for appellant.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 252-254 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Samuel Kramer, of New York City, for appellee State of New York.

Mr. Henry S. Manley, of Albany, N.Y., for appellee Ten Eyck and others.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. Ten EyckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API