Legal Opinion

Buggeln v. Cameron

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1907No. Civil No. 989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, in and for the County of Coconino. R. E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

— Appellant Martin Buggeln was plaintiff in an action seeking to restrain appellees herein from collecting toll upon the Bright Angel toll road. An injunction was issued, and in pursuance of an order of the court a bond upon the injunction was given by the appellant Buggeln, as principal, with the appellants T. A. Riordan and M. J. Riordan, as sureties. Upon the final hearing of the case the injunction was dissolved and the petition dismissed. Thereafter the appellees herein brought this action upon the injunction bond to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by them by reason of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Meyers v. BlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Bein v. HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Garrison v. LukeArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 611 v. Town of FarmingtonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Perkins v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Foster v. Royal Indemnity Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API