Legal Opinion
Foster v. Royal Indemnity Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1928No. 6,354PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
Action by Albert D. Foster to recover from the Royal Indemnity Company on an injunction bond after dissolution of the injunction. From the judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant has appealed.
On writs of execution on judgment in favor of Foster and against a third person, certain personal property was levied upon and advertised for sale on February 19, 1297. Prior to said date the public administrator of Yellowstone county, without notice to Foster or the sheriff, secured a temporary injunction prohibiting the sale, effective on his furnishing a bond in the sum of $1,000. The Royal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Meyers v. BlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Methodist Churches of New York v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Hayden v. KeithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Swan v. KuehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Sheridan County Electric Co-Op., Inc. v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- Hatch v. National Surety Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
- Morgen & Oswood Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1975
- Bunston v. LabbittMontana Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.