Legal Opinion
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Cactus Craft of Arizona and Carlos E. Velasco, James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Cactus Craft of Arizona and Carlos E. Velasco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1973No. 26919PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
481 F.2d 464
21 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 145, 71 Lab.Cas. P 32,928
James D. HODGSON, Secretary of Labor, United States
Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CACTUS CRAFT OF ARIZONA and Carlos E. Velasco, Defendants-Appellants.
James D. HODGSON, Secretary of Labor, United States
Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CACTUS CRAFT OF ARIZONA and Carlos E. Velasco, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 26919, 26877.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
June 26, 1973.
Edith Barnett, Washington, D. C., Atty., (argued) Richard F. Schubert, Sol. of Labor, Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Richard Burke,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Albert S. Craig v. Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation, Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Albert S. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- George Wainscoat v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a Corporation, Joe Harlan v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Hodgson v. Cactus CraftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by16 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. The Claridge Hotel and CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Donovan v. Dialamerica Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Secretary of Labor v. Daylight Dairy Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff v. Union Pacific Motor Freight Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.