Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rufini v. CitiMortgage CA1/3

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 2014No. A138480UnpublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIGGINS, J.

James Rufini challenges an order sustaining a demurrer, without leave to amend, to his complaint concerning a failed home loan modification and eventual foreclosure. He contends his complaint adequately alleges causes of action for wrongful foreclosure, breach of contract and of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and unfair business practices. We affirm the trial court’s order sustaining the demurrer to the causes of action for general negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and an accounting, and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Thompson v. IoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Fleet v. Bank of America CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Fonteno v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Goncharov v. Uber Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API