In re the Claim of Drevins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 3, 1997, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was not totally unemployed during the time he was receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Claimant admitted that during the relevant time period he helped his wife in her commercial and residential cleaning business. Although claimant disputed how often he assisted his wife…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Claim of MizenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of ChiricoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of Kingsley-AgurkisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of CiraoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003