Haskins v. Crumley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem. *
Respondent in this case moves to strike appellants’ opening brief, and to dismiss the appeal. The motion is made upon the ground that appellants have not complied with rules 4(b), 13 and 15(a), Rules on Appeal.
The motion under rule 4(b) is made because appellants designated portions only of the proceedings on the trial to be transcribed by the reporter, and failed to state in their notice of appeal the points upon which they rely.
In opposition to the motion appellants say that the testimony ordered reported is all that there is upon the specific points they urge on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jarkieh v. BadagliaccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Lundy v. LakinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pesce v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Slawinski v. MocettiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Hooper v. Byron Jackson Pumps, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960