Hooper v. Byron Jackson Pumps, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem.*
The issue on this appeal is quite simple: Did the trial court err in reading to the jury sections 525.1 and 551 of the Vehicle Code? The facts of the ease did not bring those sections into play, and we have concluded that, in this particular case, the error in giving the instructions was prejudicial.
Before dealing with the question of the instructions we dispose of respondents’ contention that plaintiff’s appeal should be dismissed because she failed to comply with rule 4(b), Rules on Appeal. This was an action, tried before a jury, for damages resulting to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haskins v. CrumleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Marshallan Manufacturing Co. v. BrackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963