Legal Opinion

State v. Jay J. Garfield Building Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1931No. Criminal No. 761PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The defendant was informed against by the county attorney of Pima county for refusing and failing to pay one of its employees the current rate of wage for work on the construction and alteration of a school building' for Tuscon school district No. 1 of Pima county. A jury was waived and the case tried before the court upon a statement of facts stipulated by the parties.

The defendant by motion in the nature of a demurrer moved to dismiss the action on the ground that the admitted facts do not constitute a public offense, although they aptly describe all the acts the statute requires to make…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. People Ex Rel. Rodgers v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. State v. . PartlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Ruark v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 37Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. WhitsettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. LocksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. StarskyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State of Arizona v. Walgreen Drug Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API