Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. Whitsett

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13498PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as chairman of the board of directors of the petitioner district, to sign a contract for the construction of Entrance Hill Road, located in Riverside County, and to be used in conjunction with the Colorado River aqueduct.

After notice inviting proposals, the contract was duly awarded to Martin Bros. Trucking Company. The particular work to be performed is the construction of about 6.45 miles of graded road, involving approximately 44,000 cubic yards of excavation, with appurtenant metal pipe culverts, concrete protection…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Heim v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. People Ex Rel. Rodgers v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Meridian, Ltd. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API