Legal Opinion
Boral v. Caldwell
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1963No. Civ. 27339PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
The instant action is for sums assertedly due under a guaranty of a lease; the faithful performance guaranteed by defendants was not more than $6,000. Plaintiffs were given judgment for $439 and costs; they have appealed. It is contended that the evidence does not support certain key findings of fact and, therefore, the conclusions of law drawn therefrom.
On June 15, 1960, hy an instrument in writing, plaintiffs leased the subject premises to Crystalstone Corporation for a period of two years, commencing that same day. The lessee agreed to pay a total sum of $24,000, payable in installments as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mashon v. HaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Martin v. CassidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Garfinkle v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Firlotte v. JesseeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Lande v. Southern California Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alhambra Consolidated Mines, Inc. v. Alhambra Shumway Mines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Leiter v. EltingeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Schafer v. Wholesale Frozen Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- California Medical Assn. v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981