Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 22, 1994PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
272 N.J. Super. 435 (1994)
640 A.2d 325
MARC SHERMAN, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 27, 1994.
Decided April 22, 1994.
Before Judges SHEBELL, LONG and LANDAU.
Michael D. Donovan of Chimicles, Burt, Jacobsen & McNew, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant; Spector Gadon & Rosen, attorneys for appellant (Ann Miller, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel; Paul R. Rosen and Robert L. Grundlock, Jr., on both the brief and the reply…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First National Bank in Plant City v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Copeland v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Hunter v. Greenwood Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.