Legal Opinion

State v. . Breece

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The evidence for the State tended to show that approximately two thousand accounts had been sent to the defendant for collection-. The defendant contended that he had made many remittances direct to the concerns forwarding claims for which no credit had been given. The State’s witness Sorenson testified: “I have been back there and checked the books on him myself in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. I did not keep the books but checked the records. I don’t know which ones of those have been paid direct and which have not been paid direct.” The defendant in apt time objected to the testimony of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. Bynum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Flowers v. SpearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. R. R. v. . HegwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Flowers v. . SpearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Atlas Supply Co. v. McCurrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BumperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Dairy & Ice Cream Supply Co. v. Gastonia Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API