State v. Cochran
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: ROBERT G. MORROW, Judge. The defendant, Sam Cochran, was tried and convicted for the violation of the local option law in the City of St. Johns and from the judgment following such conviction, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice King
Mr. Justice Eakin and Mr. Chief Justice Moore dissent.
*1601. Defendant was informed against, tried, and convicted in the circuit court for violating what is known as the local option law (Laws 1905, p. 41), in precinct No. 91 in the city of St. Johns. The council of that city, acting upon the advice of the city attorney to the effect that the local option law did not apply to that locality, adopted an ordinance permitting the sale of intoxicating liquors upon the payment of a license fee of $1,200 per annum. Defendant, after paying the required license fee, was given a license to sell spirituous,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Chicago Packing & Provision Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- State ex rel. v. Malheur County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Strickland v. GeideOregon Supreme Court · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Evanhoff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Achenbach v. KincaidIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
- Jones v. HossOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- In re KesslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.