Legal Opinion

Sinchak v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 22, 2011No. AC 29068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The petitioner, Anthony Sinchak, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgments of the habeas court denying his consolidated petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court (1) abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal from the judgments rejecting his claim that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance and (2) failed to conduct a sufficient inquiiy into his allegation that a conflict of interest existed between him and his habeas counsel. We dismiss the appeal.

Th…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Mozell v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Sinchak v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Abreu v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Lapointe v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  5. Sinchak v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API