Legal Opinion

Sinchak v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 22, 2011No. AC 29193PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The petitioner, Anthony Sinchak, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus that alleged ineffective assistance of habeas counsel. On appeal, he claims that the court improperly (1) failed to appoint counsel to represent him when he filed his habeas petition and (2) dismissed his petition as premature. Because we agree with the petitioner’s first claim, and subsequent events have rendered moot the court’s determination that the petition was premature, we reverse the judgment of the habeas court.

The following procedural…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Gaines v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Negron v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaddah v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  4. Alston v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  5. Francis v. Commissioner of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API