Legal Opinion
Manius v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 17, 2002No. 27377-2-IIPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, C.J.
Lila and John Doe Boyd appeal the trial court’s entry of an arbitration award and order striking their request for a trial de novo based on defective proof of service by mail. Holding that the Boyds’ proof of service by mail complied with MAR 7.1, we reverse and remand for a trial de novo.
FACTS
The Boyds’ lawsuit against Linda and Lawrence Manius was transferred to mandatory arbitration. The arbitrator entered an award in the Maniuses’ favor. The Boyds served and filed a timely request for trial de novo and a document entitled “Certificate of Service,” signed by Sandra Barlow, the Boyds’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Terry v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Manius v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Alvarez v. BanachWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Alvarez v. BanachWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Thomas-Kerr v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Simmerly v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.