Bell Aircraft Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*685HOWELL, Judge.
Plaintiff sues to recover $2,286,819.95 alleged to be reimbursable items of cost incurred in the performance of four cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contracts (hereinafter referred to as CPFF contracts) for the manufacture and delivery of military aircraft known as P-39’s or Airacobras, entered into with defendant through the United States Army Air Corps.1 Of the total sum claimed to be due under the contracts, $1,035,918.73 represent experimental and development expense, and $1,250,901.22 represent production tooling cost.2 It is plaintiff’s contention that the sum in suit represents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Mason & Hanger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Wunderlich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- James Stewart & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1951
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
3Cited by11 opinions
- Farwell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- General Dynamics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- United States Steel Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Binghamton Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Penberthy Electromelt International Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.