Binghamton Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
Plaintiff brings this suit to recover under its contract with the War Department Corps of Engineers for the construction of a flood wall along the Chemung River in Elmira, New York. Plaintiff presents three claims as follows:
Claim for reimbursement of wage rates paid to carpenters,
laborers, and concrete puddlers_$15,697.38
Claim regarding measurement of' sheeting and shoring— 14,785.55
Claim for finishing of concrete_ 6,934.26
Total_ 37,317.19
Plaintiff’s first claim is that it was misled by defendant as to the wages it would be required to pay in carrying out the *834contract. Briefly stated, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
- United States v. BeuttasSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Barlow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1900
- Penker Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Arcole Midwest Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- United States v. Idlewild Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969
- Arcole Midwest Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Farwell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953