Legal Opinion

Binghamton Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 7, 1952No. 48525PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

Plaintiff brings this suit to recover under its contract with the War Department Corps of Engineers for the construction of a flood wall along the Chemung River in Elmira, New York. Plaintiff presents three claims as follows:

Claim for reimbursement of wage rates paid to carpenters,

laborers, and concrete puddlers_$15,697.38

Claim regarding measurement of' sheeting and shoring— 14,785.55

Claim for finishing of concrete_ 6,934.26

Total_ 37,317.19

Plaintiff’s first claim is that it was misled by defendant as to the wages it would be required to pay in carrying out the *834contract. Briefly stated, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  3. United States v. BeuttasSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Barlow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1900
  5. Penker Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Arcole Midwest Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. United States v. Idlewild Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969
  4. Arcole Midwest Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Farwell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API