Legal Opinion

Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1964No. 8235PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

In this jury-tried action for recovery under the collision coverage alleged to have been afforded by an automobile insurance policy issued by M.F.A. Mutual Insurance Company, the defendant herein, plaintiff Claude J. Hood initially had judgment for $1,500 upon the jury verdict in that amount. Upon plaintiff’s remittitur of $550, defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled, and this appeal by defendant from the reduced judgment of $950 has followed.

By defendant’s Policy No. 1-248028 (hereinafter referred to as the policy) issued to plaintiff, whose occupation was shown as…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bridgeforth v. ProffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. St. Joseph Light & Power Co. v. Kaw Valley Tunneling, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Household Finance Company, Inc. v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API