Legal Opinion

In the Interest of B.H.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 25, 2003No. 88,484PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buchele, J:

The natural father of N.H. and B.H. (children) appeals the termination of his parental rights. He claims that the delay in reaching trial of this case violated his due process right; the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of an alcohol counselor and individual therapist; and there was a lack of substantial evidence to support unfitness or that he was likely to change in the foreseeable future. We disagree and affirm.

On May 20,1999, the State filed a child in need of care (CINC) petition as to the children. The petition alleged, among other things, that the father had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In The Interest of S.M.Q.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. State v. FinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. In the Interest of J.L.D.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  5. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of L.C.W.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  2. In the Interest of N.A.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  3. In Re LCWCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API