Legal Opinion
In the Interest of J.L.D.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided June 22, 1990No. 64,264PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Prager, J.:
J.J.C. (appellant), the natural father of J.L.D., appeals the district court’s termination of his parental rights pursuant to K.S.A. 38-1583, contending his due process rights were violated because he was not afforded the opportunity to be present at the termination hearing. We affirm.
The facts in the case are important and essentially undisputed. J.J.C. and B.D. are the natural parents of J.L.D. The record *488does not reflect whether the parents were ever legally married. Appellant was in Florida when his son was born on July 11, 1987. He returned to Kansas but was arrested in August…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Interest of FHNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Jeanette H. v. PancakeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Adoption of EdmundMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Daryl v. BoydDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- In the Interest of M.D.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.