Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 1960No. Gen. 48,092PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friend

Continental Casualty Company (Continental) brought suit against New Amsterdam Casualty Company (Amsterdam) to recover a portion of money paid by Continental in settlement of a claim which was asserted against Cyrus Collins, the insured of both companies. The case was heard on the pleadings and motions for summary judgment. The court granted Amsterdam’s motion, denied Continental’s, and entered the judgment from which Continental appeals.

There is substantial agreement as to the facts presented in the pleadings and affidavits. The controversy arises solely as to the interpretation of the two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. American Surety Company of New York, and Cross-Appellee v. Canal Insurance Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  4. Arditi v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Buckeye Union Casualty Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Certain UnderwritersIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. Jensen v. New Amsterdam InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API