American Surety Company of New York, and Cross-Appellee v. Canal Insurance Company, and Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.
This is a controversy between two insurance companies over their relative obligations respecting the liabilities of a lessee of trucking equipment which had been involved in a highway collision. The District Court held that no effect could be given an excess insurance clause, applicable to hired vehicles, in American Surety’s policy issued to the lessee, because of a pro rata contribution clause in Canal’s policy issued to the lessor, and covering the specific equipment, the protection of which was extended by an omnibus clause to the lessee. Judgment was entered…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. ClamorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Speier Et Ux. v. AylingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- McFarland v. Chicago Exp., Inc. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. American Employers' Ins. Co. Of Boston, MassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Curtis Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Certain UnderwritersIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Coronet InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.