Legal Opinion

Arditi v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 14, 1958No. 46347PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYDE, Judge.

Action in equity in nature of garnishment, under Section 379.200 RSMo 1949, V.A.M. S. Plaintiffs each sought payment of a judgment for $10,000.00 against defendant Brooks Erection Company (hereinafter called “Brooks”), in their respective actions for personal injuries, and sued to collect from the two defendant insurance companies (hereinafter called “Massachusetts” and “Travelers”). All parties have appealed from the judgment entered, which prorated the amount to be paid by the insurance companies, both as to what was found due to plaintiffs on their judgments and what was found…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Berghorn v. Reorganized School District No. 8Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  5. Soukup v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChappellMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API